INTEROPERABLE BIODIVERSITY UNIT
SavimboPublic feedback formEspañolRights of Nature
  • Executive summary
  • Front materials
  • Background
    • Common mistakes
    • Climate change and biodiversity loss
    • A rare catalyst for a wicked problem
    • Technical requirements for an area-based biodiversity unit
    • Social requirements for a well-designed unit
  • Unit of a biodiversity credit
  • Area
  • Time
  • Integrity
  • Value
  • Calculation of a biodiversity credit
  • Example calculations
  • VBCs and iVBCs
  • Adoption
  • Authors
  • FAQ
  • Document history
  • Disclaimer
  • References
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Unit of a biodiversity credit

An interoperable unit for biodiversity crediting

PreviousSocial requirements for a well-designed unitNextArea

Last updated 1 year ago

This is an area-based unit. It is meant to measure a functional ecosystem. This biodiversity unit has standard dimensions (Area, Time, and Integrity) and it has a grade (Value).

After a comprehensive review of the biodiversity credit landscape, we have intentionally normalized the Voluntary Biodiversity Credits issued in our conservation methodology to an interoperable Unit which can also be used for other methodologies. This unit works for any ecosystem, metric, or methodology and covers conservation, restoration, pollination, or eradication activities.

Of particular note, although we are opposed to offsetting, this unit also works for corporate disclosures of biodiversity impacts and can contribute to international accounting at the local, state, national, or international levels.

The area-based biodiversity unit has the following components:

UNIT = (1 hectare) for (1 month) with (scale from 0 to 1, as determined by bespoke methodologies) categorized by (Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze)

Where the dimensions are:

  • fixed at 1 hectare.

  • fixed at 1 month (monitoring periods will almost always be longer but units are small).

  • on a scale from 0 to 1, as determined by bespoke methodologies. Where full integrity is all ecosystem niches available to and occupied by native species.

And the grade is:

  • or the planet-wide value of preserving the ecosystem where the hectare is located.

A complete explanation of these components follows.

Value vs Integrity

Value and Integrity components were designed to make ecosystems comparable, ocean vs desert. Humans have no right to judge the intrinsic worth of other species. Desert animals have as much right to exist as jungle animals do; however, the density of unique DNA protected by an ecosystem makes higher biodiverse regions a higher priority for planetary funding.

It is critical to distinguish between the of the ecosystem, which is based on how many ecological niches are filled, and the of the ecosystem, which represents the underlying biodiversity density and the threat of degradation and is determined by geographical location.

For example, an ecosystem in the arctic ice sheets which is fully occupied by native species would receive a bronze grade and issue bronze units because it is less biodiverse than a hectare in the Colombian Amazon, which would receive a platinum grade.

  • Full credits are awarded to completely intact ecosystems (with Integrity of 1), and partial credits are awarded to partially degraded ecosystems, in accordance with their measured Integrity (eg. 0.5).

  • Areas near high-value ecosystems (forest outside of a biodiversity hotspot), or high-density ecosystems that are not threatened (Amazon with low deforestation rates) could have full Integrity, but will have a lower Value.

  • Degraded areas within high-value ecosystems, (eg. cattle farm in a biodiversity hotspot) could be high Value, but would have low Integrity.

We will address each element in turn.

AREA
TIME
INTEGRITY
VALUE
Area
Time
Integrity
Value
Integrity
Value
Voluntary Biodiversity Credit (VBC) components - Ecological Benefits Framework
Page cover image