INTEROPERABLE BIODIVERSITY UNIT
SavimboPublic feedback formEspañolRights of Nature
  • Executive summary
  • Front materials
  • Background
    • Common mistakes
    • Climate change and biodiversity loss
    • A rare catalyst for a wicked problem
    • Technical requirements for an area-based biodiversity unit
    • Social requirements for a well-designed unit
  • Unit of a biodiversity credit
  • Area
  • Time
  • Integrity
  • Value
  • Calculation of a biodiversity credit
  • Example calculations
  • VBCs and iVBCs
  • Adoption
  • Authors
  • FAQ
  • Document history
  • Disclaimer
  • References
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • File versioning (Savimbo version)
  • Methodology versions
  • Public reviewers

Document history

Document, version, and methodology history

This methodology has undergone independent public and private feedback since its inception. Several certification bodies have considered adopting it and they will adapt it for use within their crediting frameworks leading to "forks". The Savimbo version remains publically available, with expanded sections for projects not seeking accreditation, or using the methodology for outcomes tracking or MRV alone.

File versioning (Savimbo version)

Version
Date
Name
Description

1.0

June 11, 2023

Savimbo

Savimbo internal draft

1.0

Jun 22, 2023 - Oct 11, 2023

Savimbo public consultation

Savimbo public consultation

1.1-S

Jan 10, 2024

International presentation

Presentation to major certifiers, regulators, and commodities exchanges

1.1-S

Nov 5 - 2023

Savimbo revision

Savimbo revision based on Cercarbono feedback

Methodology versions

Version
Last updated
Name
Description

Savimbo

Nov 5, 2023

1.1-S

Public IPLC version maintained with additional parameters for projects who will not seek certification but instead deliver MRV data directly to buyers or sponsors

Cercarbono

Nov 5, 2023

1.1-C

Savimbo ISBM adapted for use within Cercarbono biodiversity crediting program

Public reviewers

This unit has incorporated feedback from a number of public and private reviewers. Public reviewers whose comments informed revisions are listed in order of contribution, however they remain independent and are not responsible for the final content.

Scientific reviewer, Independent

Scientific reviewer, Independent

Scientific reviewer, Independent

Scientific reviewer, Independent

Scientific reviewer, Independent

Advocacy reviewer, Independent

Cultural reviewer, Independent

Marine scientific reviewer, Independent

Scientific reviewer, Independent

Scientific reviewer, Independent

Daniel Urbano

Scientific reviewer, Independent

PreviousFAQNextDisclaimer

Last updated 1 year ago

Galena Woodhouse
Ned Horning
Aleksandra Holmlund
Karl Burkhart
Lauren Serota
Michael McColm
Peter Thomas
Jesús Argente
Alvaro Vallejo
Ramesh Boonratana PhD